Performance of High Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing Compared to Nucleic Acid Testing.

OBJECTIVE: Independent assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antigen (COV2Ag) tests remains important as varying performance between assays is common. We assessed the performance of a new high-throughput COV2Ag test compared to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT). METHODS: A total of 347 nasopharyngeal samples collected from January to October 2021 were assessed by NAAT as part of standard-of-care testing (CDC LDT or GeneXpert System, Cepheid) and COV2Ag using the ADVIA Centaur CoV2Ag assay (Siemens Healthineers). RESULTS: Among NAAT positive specimens we found 82.4% agreement and in NAAT negative specimens we found 97.3% agreement (overall agreement 85.6%). In symptomatic persons, COV2Ag agreed with NAAT 90.0% (n = 291), and in asymptomatic persons, 62.5% (n = 56). Agreement between positive NAAT and COV2Ag increased at lower cycle threshold (Ct) values. CONCLUSION: The COV2Ag assay exceeded the World Health Organization minimum performance requirements of ≥ 80% sensitivity and ≥ 97% specificity. The COV2Ag assay is helpful for large scale screening efforts due to high-throughput and reduced wait times.

Tixagevimab Plus Cilgavimab Does Not Affect the Interpretation of Electrophoretic and Free Light Chain Assays.

OBJECTIVES: There is concern that the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, used as preexposure prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma, may appear as a detectable monoclonal protein by electrophoretic methods, resulting in misinterpretation or inability to measure therapeutic responses in some patients. In this pilot study, we characterize the effect of tixagevimab plus cilgavimab (Evusheld; T + C) on interpretation of serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), and serum free light chain (sFLC) assays. METHODS: We performed spiking experiments with T + C at serum maximum concentration following a 300-mg dose (1× Cmax) and at 10 times the concentration of Cmax (10× Cmax) with pooled serum samples. SPE and IFE technical procedures were performed on the SPIFE 3000, and sFLC and immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) subtype quantitation was performed on the Optilite. RESULTS: T + C-associated interference was not visible as an M-spike in normogammaglobulinemic pooled samples. Hypogammaglobulemic pooled samples at 10× Cmax demonstrated an M-spike in SPE and immunoglobulin Gκ pattern in IFE. No increases were noted in the results of sFLC or IgG1 levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that T + C at pharmacologic Cmax is unlikely to interfere with SPE, IFE, sFLC, or IgG1 analyses when spiked into patient serum samples, but further evaluation of recently injected patients may be warranted.

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines May Cause False Reactivity in Some Serologic Laboratory Tests, Including Rapid Plasma Reagin Tests.

OBJECTIVES: Acute viral infections and some vaccines have been shown to increase false positivity in serologic assays. We assessed if the messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines could cause false reactivity in common serologic assays in a pilot longitudinal cohort. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants with sera available prevaccination, 2 weeks after each vaccine dose, and monthly thereafter for up to 5 months were tested for common infectious disease serologies and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) serology markers on the BioPlex 2200, Sure-Vue rapid plasma reagin (RPR), and Macro-Vue RPR. Twenty-two participants received the Moderna vaccine and 16 received the Pfizer vaccine. RESULTS: Most assays had no change in reactivity over the course of the sample draws, including APS markers. Epstein-Barr virus immunoglobulin G (IgG), measles IgG, and rubella immunoglobulin M all had possible false reactivity in one to two participants. RPR tests demonstrated false reactivity, with baseline nonreactive participant samples becoming reactive following vaccination. There were more false reactive participants (7/38) in the BioPlex RPR than in the Sure-Vue (2/38) and Macro-Vue (1/38) tests. All falsely reactive RPR tests were in participants who received the Moderna vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Serologic assays with results that do not fit the clinical picture following COVID-19 vaccination should be repeated. Effects of false reactivity can last more than 5 months in some assays. In particular, RPR is susceptible to false reactivity, and there is variability among assays. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to determine the incidence and window of false reactivity.